Skip to main content

MarketBetter vs Gong/Clari for Activity Tracking: One Dashboard for Every Channel Your Team Touches

ยท 9 min read
MarketBetter Team
Content Team, marketbetter.ai
Share this article

Sales teams in 2026 touch prospects across five or six channels before a deal moves to stage two. Email sequences, LinkedIn DMs, cold calls, follow-up voicemails, video messages, even the occasional conference hallway conversation that gets logged after the fact. Every one of those touchpoints matters. And yet the two biggest names in revenue intelligence โ€” Gong and Clari โ€” still treat activity tracking as a side effect of their core product, not the main event.

Unified activity dashboard showing cross-channel sales touchpoints

The Fragmentation Problemโ€‹

Here is a question every sales leader should be able to answer in under ten seconds: across my entire team, how many touchpoints happened yesterday, broken down by channel, rep, and account?

If you are running Gong plus Clari plus your CRM plus a sequencing tool, the honest answer is "I would need to open four tabs and spend twenty minutes cross-referencing." That is not a workflow. That is archaeology.

The data backs this up. Sales reps spend an average of 28% of their week on actual selling. The rest disappears into CRM data entry (17%), internal meetings (15%), and admin work. Reps burn more than seven hours per week on manual data entry alone โ€” and 18% say that data entry overhead has directly caused lost deals. The problem is not laziness. It is that the tools were never designed to capture activity automatically across every channel a modern rep uses.

What Gong Actually Tracksโ€‹

Gong built its reputation on conversation intelligence, and it deserves that reputation. Nobody does call recording and analysis better. The problem is scope.

Gong's analytics engine was designed around recorded conversations โ€” calls, video meetings, and to a lesser extent emails processed through its integration layer. Its Smart Trackers use GLOVE vector embeddings (technology dating to 2017-2018) that operate at the sentence level, requiring 50 to 100 example sentences of manual training per tracker. The AI Data Extractor caps at 20 fields per workspace. These are tools built to analyze what was said on calls, not to give you a unified picture of every touchpoint across every channel.

When Gong launched its Engage module to handle outreach, it added email and sequencing capabilities. But Engage analytics remain tethered to Gong's data capture constraints. LinkedIn activity, manual calls made outside of Gong's dialer, follow-up tasks, and offline touchpoints either require manual logging or fall through the cracks entirely.

Pricing compounds the problem. Gong's bundled packages (Core + Engage + Forecast) run $2,880 to $3,000 per user per year. The platform fee alone ranges from $5,000 to $50,000 annually, and onboarding starts at $7,500. For a 20-rep team, you are looking at $65,000 to $110,000 per year โ€” for a tool that still cannot tell you how many LinkedIn touches your team made yesterday without a separate integration.

What Clari Actually Tracksโ€‹

Clari approaches the problem from the opposite direction. Where Gong starts with conversations, Clari starts with pipeline. Its forecasting engine is genuinely excellent at tracking deal progression, stage changes, and revenue predictions. Waterfall analytics show what changed in your pipeline and when.

But Clari's activity tracking has a well-documented complexity problem. Users consistently report that the activity tracking logic is difficult to explain to sellers, and the platform requires significant training investment to adopt. Implementation timelines run 8 to 16 weeks with professional services fees between $15,000 and $75,000.

Clari acquired Groove in 2023 to bolster its sales engagement capabilities, but Groove still lags behind dedicated engagement platforms in features and reliability. And then the December 2025 merger with Salesloft created near-term uncertainty around packaging, pricing, and product direction that is still shaking out. If you are buying Clari today, you are betting on a roadmap that the company itself is still defining.

On cost: Clari's core forecasting module runs $100 to $120 per user per month. Add Groove for engagement and Copilot for AI assistance and you are at $200+ per user per month, or roughly $48,000 per year for a 20-rep team โ€” before implementation fees push that well past $60,000 in year one.

The Channel Blindspot Both Shareโ€‹

Here is the core issue: Gong was built to analyze conversations. Clari was built to forecast revenue. Neither was built to answer the fundamental question that drives daily sales execution: what did my team actually do today across every channel, and what needs to happen next?

Modern B2B outreach requires an average of 5 to 7 touches before a prospect engages for the first time. Those touches span email, LinkedIn, phone, and increasingly channels like community forums and social platforms. When your activity data lives in three different tools, you lose the cross-channel sequencing context that separates a coordinated outreach strategy from random noise.

A rep sends a cold email on Monday, a LinkedIn connection request on Tuesday, and calls on Wednesday. In Gong, you see the call. In your sequencing tool, you see the email. In LinkedIn, you see the connection request. Nowhere do you see the three-touch sequence as a single coordinated effort against one account. That cross-channel context is exactly what managers need to coach effectively and what reps need to prioritize their day.

How MarketBetter's Activity Dashboard Worksโ€‹

MarketBetter's redesigned Activity Dashboard was built from the ground up to solve this specific problem. Every rep touchpoint โ€” email sends and replies, LinkedIn messages and connection requests, phone calls and voicemails, follow-up tasks, meeting bookings โ€” flows into a single, filterable timeline.

One View, Every Channelโ€‹

The dashboard consolidates activity from every channel your team uses into a unified stream. No tab-switching between tools. No manual reconciliation. Each activity is tagged with its channel, rep, account, and contact โ€” so you can slice the data any way your workflow demands.

Filter by rep to see their full day. Filter by account to see every touchpoint from every rep. Filter by channel to see LinkedIn-only or call-only activity. Filter by campaign to see how a specific sequence is performing across all channels simultaneously.

Automatic Activity Captureโ€‹

MarketBetter captures activity automatically from connected channels. Email sends, opens, and replies sync in real time. LinkedIn activities โ€” connection requests, messages, profile views, and InMail โ€” log without manual entry. Call activities including duration, outcome, and notes attach to the right contact and account. Follow-up tasks and meeting bookings close the loop.

Reps stop spending 7+ hours per week on CRM data entry. Managers stop wondering whether the data in their reports reflects what actually happened.

Cross-Channel Sequence Visibilityโ€‹

This is where the unified view pays the biggest dividend. When every touchpoint lives in one timeline, you can see the multi-channel sequence playing out in real time. The email-LinkedIn-call pattern is visible as a cohesive strategy, not three disconnected events.

Managers can spot when a rep is over-indexing on email and neglecting phone. They can see when a high-value account has gone cold across every channel. They can identify which sequence patterns produce the best conversion rates โ€” not just by email open rate, but by composite cross-channel engagement.

Pipeline Impact Attributionโ€‹

Activity tracking without pipeline context is just counting. MarketBetter connects every activity to its pipeline impact, so you can trace the path from first touch to closed deal across every channel. Which combination of touches moved an account from cold to meeting? How many LinkedIn touches preceded the phone call where the prospect finally picked up? That attribution data feeds directly into lead scoring models and helps teams optimize their playbooks with real cross-channel data.

The Comparison at a Glanceโ€‹

CapabilityGongClariMarketBetter
Call recording and analysisDeepVia Salesloft mergerIntegrated
Email activity trackingVia EngageVia GrooveNative, automatic
LinkedIn activity trackingRequires third-party integrationRequires third-party integrationNative, automatic
Cross-channel unified viewNoNoYes
Automatic activity captureCalls and some emailPartial, complex setupAll channels
Real-time activity feedCalls onlyPipeline changesAll activity types
Implementation timeline4-8 weeks8-16 weeksDays
20-rep annual cost$65K-$110K+$48K-$60K+Starts significantly lower

Who Should Stay With Gong or Clariโ€‹

Gong is the right choice if your primary need is conversation intelligence โ€” deep call analysis, coaching based on talk patterns, and deal risk assessment from what was said in meetings. If calls are 80% of your team's selling motion, Gong's depth in that channel is unmatched.

Clari is the right choice if revenue forecasting accuracy is your top priority and you have the implementation budget and timeline to deploy it properly. For VP-level pipeline visibility and board-ready forecasts, Clari's waterfall analytics deliver.

Who Should Switch to MarketBetterโ€‹

If your team operates across email, LinkedIn, phone, and other channels โ€” and most modern sales teams do โ€” then you need a tool built for cross-channel reality, not one trying to bolt it on after the fact.

MarketBetter's Activity Dashboard is built for teams that:

  • Run multi-channel outreach sequences and need to see the complete picture
  • Want automatic activity capture across every channel without manual CRM data entry
  • Need cross-channel attribution to understand which combination of touchpoints drives pipeline
  • Cannot justify $60K+ per year for tools that still leave blind spots in LinkedIn and cross-channel visibility
  • Want to be operational in days, not months

The GTM tech stack landscape is consolidating toward unified platforms that handle the full outreach workflow. Point solutions for calls (Gong) and forecasting (Clari) made sense when there was nothing better. Now there is.

Try Itโ€‹

The Activity Dashboard is live for all MarketBetter accounts. If you are currently stitching together Gong, Clari, and a sequencing tool to approximate what a unified activity view should look like, request a demo and see the difference in ten minutes.

Your reps are already making the touches. It is time your tools actually tracked all of them.

Share this article